E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Professors’ Brief in Seventh Circuit Guns Case Calls for the Restoration of the Privileges or Immunities Clause
Doug Kendall
Back in December, we blogged here that the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller would lead to momentous incorporation question, and could open the door to the rejuvenation of the Privileges or Immunities Clause, the text in the Fourteenth Amendment that protects substantive fundamental rights against state infringement.
On Wednesday, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in the consolidated cases of McDonald, et al., and National Rifle Association of America, Inc., et al., v. City of Chicago, et al., and Village of Oak Park, arguing that right to keep and bear arms recognized in Heller is “incorporated” against state action via the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. CAC’s “friend of the court” brief was filed on behalf of four preeminent constitutional scholars including Balkinization’s very own Jack Balkin.
Our brief echoes CAC’s report, The Gem of the Constitution, which explains that the Privileges or Immunities Clause was intended to be the centerpiece of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the critical constitutional language guaranteeing the fundamental rights of all Americans. In The Gem, we say that “all Americans should cheer a ruling that finally honors some of our Constitution’s most important text and history,” and we are urging the court to make such a ruling in this case.
Our brief also brings to the fore the surprisingly progressive Reconstruction history of the right to bear arms. It shows that the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment sought to constitutionally protect this right against state infringement, in large part because they wanted the newly freed slaves to have the means to protect themselves, their families and their property against well-armed former rebels.
(David Gans is Constitutional Accountability Center's Human and Civil Rights Director, Doug Kendall is CAC's President. For more on the progressive force of the Constitution's text and history, visit our blog, http://www.textandhistory.org/). Posted
11:27 AM
by Doug Kendall [link]