Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Tribe on Burris and the Temporal Factor
|
Saturday, January 03, 2009
Tribe on Burris and the Temporal Factor
JB
Over at Forbes, Larry Tribe argues that Powell v. McCormack is distinguishable and that the Senate may refuse to seat Roland Burris. His argument is similar to that offered by Akhil Amar and Josh Chafetz, Mark Tushnet, and me. He concludes with the following:
Comments:
A crucial element will be the willingness AND ability of the Senate to assert its prerogative to determine what this patch of the Constitutional text means. If the Senate sees itself as having the authority to judge the qualifications of its own members, and it sees itself as the final word on this, why need it pay attention to the Supreme Court's decision in Powell v. McCormack?
Assume the Senate refuses to seat Burris. Assume Burris sues in court. Assume it quickly gets reviewed by SCOTUS. And assume SCOTUS rules in favor of Burris (does it matter if it is 5-4, or 9-0?). The question then is whether the Senate will assert its prerogative (from its point of view) on the qualifications clause, AND whether it is willing to stand up for it. In this case it appears that both Democrats and Republicans may well join together in refusing to seat Burris. It is embarrassing for Democrats, but it would be even more embarrassing for Republicans to argue that Burris should be seated: rather their political stance seems to require asserting that Blagojevich (a Democrat) is so corrupt that it taints any of his appointees. Under this scenario, the collective action problem becomes interesting. Despite the partisan conflict within the Senate, there is the possibility of the Senate being united on this issue. But then the question becomes the extent to which the Senate feels obliged to comply with judgments of the Supreme Court. I see the potential for a departmentalism conflict; but if that is the case, I also expect the Senate to be as spineless as it has ever been recently (think DTA, MCA, FISA reauthorization). Which would at the end of the day strengthen the judiciary's authority.
"While that investigation is ongoing, Illinois may impeach Blagojevich and a new governor may make another appointment, which the Senate will probably readily accept."
So an appointment made by one governor may be withdrawn by a successor governor? Might this be a precedent for the "pardon" power? In any event, let's welcome Larry Tribe to the dance on the head of the constitutional pin. There's plenty of room for more constitutional scholars. This is a hellova lot more fun than Heller - and very few persons may get hurt.
Tribe (and you and all the others) are still tap dancing, rather insolently, around the utterly unambiguous text of I-5-1 and A17.
At least have the intellectual honesty to state, openly and notoriously, what your analytical flowchart really is: Step 1. Dislike the plain text. Step 2. Disregard the plain text. Step 3. Congratulate yourself. The rest is all sound and fury.
Tribe’s view makes no sense to me. If a court construes the Senate’s action as judging not the appointment itself, but the “appointer,” that will make it much less likely that the action will be unreviewable. The argument against justiciability is that the Constitution gives the Senate the power to judge appointments similar to the power to judge elections, and that the refusal to seat Burris is an exercise of that power. But there is no argument that the Constitution gives the Senate the power to decide that particular Governors are too corrupt to make valid appointments, any more than it could decide that particular states are too corrupt to hold valid elections.
The simplest solution is to impeach and remove Blagojevich and for the next governor to reappoint Burris. Nobody seems to object to Burris himself, and his subsequent reappointment and seating by the Senate bypasses all litigation.
I would modify Howard Gilbert's suggestion as follows. The simplest solution is for Burris to announce that if Blagojevich is impeached (and removed), he will resign and allow the new governor to appoint anyone (including Burris) he wishes. The Senate could then seat Burris with the knowledge that, if Burris were to break his word, it could expel him with a two-thirds vote.
Tribe, Amar, and maybe you seem to be arguing that, even though this appointment probably wasn't corrupt, the process in general has been too tainted for any Blago appointee to be credible. The trouble with that argument to me is that, once Blago's impeached, the Lieutenant Governor's appointment is ultimately a product of the same process. Just as Blago was forced to tab a guy who wasn't one of the original candidates for the spot because they've all been tainted by Fitzgerald's complaint, the Lieutenant Governor, Quinn, would be loath to pick one of the original candidates himself - he, too, would most likely appoint a caretaker of Burris's ilk. But Reid isn't refusing to seat a Quinn appointee, just Blago's, even though the only taint that attaches to Burris is the same counterfactual, "if not for the corruption of the original process, he wouldn't have been picked" taint that would attach to any Quinn appointment. Now, maybe you want to bite the bullet and say that this whole process is so irredeemably corrupted that there simply must be a special election, but even that election would be tainted by the original appointment process; Jackson Jr., for instance, probably wouldn't even bother running at this point. I don't really see any end to the "taint" line of reasoning.
...and what if the governor is not removed from office and not indicted or indicted and acquitted???
One senator for Illinois? It seems to me that Senator's Reid's "decision" (if upheld) now may require the Illinois legislature to remove the Governor just so they have two senators! Who thinks this is constitution?
... and one other point concerning where to draw the line when determining when the returns of an election or an appointment can be challenged by the senate. I would say you have to look at the process that led to the election result, or in the case of an appointment, you look at the process that led to the appointment (not an "attempted past appointment"). If there is fraud or criminality in the election or specific appointment then perhaps the senate may have ground. Any other rule would blur the challenge to the appointment with the general authority of the person making the appointment. As I have said elsewhere, the general authority of the governor to make appointments should not be decided by the Senator Reid, but by the state legislature.
Of course Reid actually told Blago to pick one of two White prospects and told him NOT to select any African-American prospects. So barring Burris will not be free of the taint of that. If an employer did that he'd be sued. I wonder if Burris has a remedy under civil rights laws.
I am sorry to go off topic but I wonder when international events will become so dire and catastrophic that we will be able to discuss the Israeli invasion of Gaza on this blog. So far it seems the blog writers are afraid to mention Gaza and the human calamity that is now occuring. How about a discussion on whether Israel's actions comply with international laws on the law of war (perhaps an oxymoron) or whether they constitute war crimes.
How about a discussion on whether Israel's actions comply with international laws on the law of war (perhaps an oxymoron) or whether they constitute war crimes.
How about a discussion on whether Hamas' actions in continually bombing civilian targets over a period of months or years complies with international laws, or constitutes war crimes? Or whether launching attacks from schools, mosques, etc. and using their inhabitants as human shields complies with international laws, or constitutes war crimes? The calamity of what is going on in Gaza was entirely predictable from what preceded it. You can only attack someone for so long before they get tired of it and decide to fight back and block your ability to attack them further. At some point, the Palestinians are going to have to take responsibility for the consequences of their own actions.
tiffany and co, polo ralph lauren outlet, louboutin shoes, louis vuitton outlet, louboutin outlet, kate spade handbags, air max, michael kors outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet, louis vuitton outlet stores, nike shoes, louboutin, michael kors outlet, oakley sunglasses cheap, longchamp handbags, chanel handbags, kate spade outlet, michael kors outlet, true religion jeans, oakley sunglasses, louis vuitton, coach factory outlet, michael kors outlet, nike free, christian louboutin shoes, prada outlet, michael kors outlet, burberry outlet, tiffany and co, coach purses, burberry outlet, true religion jeans, ray ban sunglasses, prada handbags, michael kors outlet, coach outlet store online, louis vuitton handbags, tory burch outlet, air max, gucci outlet, jordan shoes, longchamp outlet, louis vuitton outlet, coach outlet, ray ban sunglasses, oakley sunglasses, longchamp handbags
Post a Comment
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |