Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Another constitutional minefield
|
Friday, September 05, 2008
Another constitutional minefield
Sandy Levinson
I have received the following message from James Pfiffner, a long-time student of the presidency who teaches at George Mason University (and who has, by the way, just published an important book on the Bush Administration, Power Play (Brookings Institution Press)). He notes the a glitch in the Constitution should the person selected by the electors to be President die before Congress meets and tallies up the electoral votes. Thus he writes:
Comments:
Under this scenario, the most likely result would be that only 1 other person received any EC votes, namely the losing candidate. The House would be forced to choose him.
However, there is a precautionary tactic which both parties could use to avoid this result. Except in cases where the EC vote is a near tie, each party could have a single elector (or 2-3, to rule out the occasional crank vote) cast a ballot for that party's VP candidate. The top 3 vote-getters would then be the winning VP candidate, the losing Presidential candidate, and the losing VP candidate. The House would choose among them. This is not a perfect solution (shades of 1824!), but it would certainly behoove the parties to do it just to avoid the electoral disaster of winning the election but defaulting in the House.
It'd be interesting to see in the situation that Mark outlines if the Democrats would all stick together and vote Obama or if some would split off and vote Biden. And I'm sure the Republicans would argue that since McCain won, all members of the House would be obliged to vote for Palin
While the Electoral College is special, it cannot be treated as generically different from every other election. Every candidate is elected by the people on election day, but then the votes are counted, recounted, and eventually the election is certified. Now over the hundreds of thousands of officials elected around the country, some must have died between the election and the certification. I don't think you could find a single example where the dead victor was declared to be a "non-person" and the loser was declared to be the winner by a similar manipulation of language. Nor is there any actual language in the 12 and 20th Amendments that force such an action. As is the practice with all other offices, the candidate who receives the most votes becomes the president elect when the votes are cast, and the counting simply certifies an election that has already occurred. Then if the president elect dies (before or after the votes are counted) the VP takes office on the prescribed date. The simple fact is that this country would not survive an attempt to steal an election through this interpretation and if a majority of the House was actually partisan enough to make the attempt, we would not deserve to survive.
I see no conundrum. Section 4 of the 20th Amendment provides that “Congress may by law provide for the case of the death of any of the persons from whom the House of Representatives may choose a President whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them.” This would only apply if no person has a majority of electors and therefore the House is required, under the 12th Amendment, to choose from “the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President.”
It wouldn’t make any sense to say that Section 4 applies if the person who had the majority of electors had died. Section 4 only applies “whenever the right of choice shall have devolved upon them.” But if the right of choice devolved upon the House because the individual with a majority of electors was dead and therefore not a “person,” it would be strange indeed to refer to that individual as a one of the “persons from whom” the House may choose. On the other hand, Section 3 explicitly deals with the situation where the President elect has died prior to the beginning of his or her term. I cannot see any logical reason why the amendment would distinguish between a President elect who dies before the votes are counted and one who dies afterwards, particularly since the counting of the votes is purely ministerial (except in rare cases such as competing slates of electors). Section 3 provides for the Vice President elect to assume the presidency in that situation, which would seem to make sense regardless of when the President elect died. I suppose one could say that if the individual who had a majority of electors died prior to the counting and was therefore not a “person,” that individual would never became a “President elect” and therefore Section 3 would not apply. One could say that, but I don’t see why one would say that, unless one had a really strong desire to find flaws in the Constitution.
Under the extremely unlikely eventuality offered in Scenario D, the representatives of the People in the House choose the President from the surviving candidates who received the votes of the People.
I am unsure why it would necessarily be more desirable for the deceased President's VP to assume the office or his or her party to choose the new President. To start the voters certainly did not choose whoever the Party of the deceased might select as a substitute. Parties have no standing under the Constitution nor were they ever intended to have any. Parties were simply a natural evolution of democracy which provided a shorthand for the voters. This is not a parliamentary system. We do not elect parties, we elect individuals. Thus, this question should be limited to the individuals for whom the People cast ballots. As a policy rather than constitutional matter, it is a close question as to whether it would be better for the VP of the deceased or the presidential candidate who received the second highest number of votes to become President. (It is theoretically possible, but highly unlikely, that the House would choose a third party candidate rather than the runner up for the presidency, so I will not go down this rabbit hole.) In favor of the VP of the deceased, one can argue that the voters elected him or her to be the spare President of the man they elected to be President should pass. On the other hand, the People cast the second highest number of votes for President for the other major party presidential candidate and may not have given a majority to the VP of the deceased if he or she was running for President in their own right. While I would personally favor the VP of the deceased, the People's representatives chose a Constitution which limited succession to those who received votes for President. This textualist is hardly about to advocate rewriting the Constitution by fiat simply because I disagree with this particular provision. The House should therefore properly choose Mr. Obama to be the next President if Mr. McCain should pass under these extremely limited circumstances. The Republic would survive an Obama Administration until Congress corrected this glitch by statute. This would not be a major constitutional crisis.
These electors are dancing on the head of a pin. No sane politician is going to go to court (or lobby Congress) for the presidency while a body is lying in state at the Capitol. It'll fall to the VP, anything else looks much too ghoulish.
"No sane politician is going to go to court (or lobby Congress) for the presidency while a body is lying in state at the Capitol."
Well, not in public, at any rate. I'm not clear about the point of this recitation of apparent failure points. (Or rather, points where you don't like the mechanism for responding to an event.) Though I'd scarcely claim to be able to prove it formally, as did Godel, wouldn't any system have it's failure points?
Re Howard Gilbert's comment, see: Patton v. Haselton, 147 NW 477 (Iowa 1914)(death of winning candidate negatives losing candidates' claim to office); After the People Vote, J.C. Fortier and W. Burns, American Enterprise Institute, 2004, p.25-26 (dead nominees can be elected, but votes for Horace Greely, a deceased losing nominee, were ignored); Successors of Ineligible Nominees, 93 Central L.J. 113 (1921)(elections of ineligible candidates are void, second place finisher does not win)
thanks so much i like very so much your post
Post a Comment
حلي الاوريو الفطر الهندي صور تورتة حلى قهوه طريقة عمل السينابون طريقة عمل بلح الشام بيتزا هت كيكة الزبادي حلا سهل صور كيك عجينة العشر دقائق طريقة عمل الدونات طريقة عمل البان كيك طريقة عمل الكنافة طريقة عمل البسبوسة طريقة عمل الكيك طريقة عمل عجينة البيتزا فوائد القرفه
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |