E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
I have posted on SSRN an essay entitled, "New Media in Old Bottles? Barron's Contextual First Amendment and Copyright in the Digital Age," which explores in more depth some of the themes that I have discussed in my posts. In the essay I begin with Jerome Barron's call, four decades ago, for access to media as a First Amendment right as a springboard for examining copyright and its role in shaping public discourse in the digital arena. I focus, in particular, on (1) incumbent mass media's untoward use of copyright as a vertical restraint to stifle the new media that provides platforms for peer speech; (2) copyright's continuing part in underwriting traditional media, which I argue is a salutary function that stands in some tension with the media's use of copyright to suppress new media competition; and (3) copyright's potential for enabling powerful new media, like Google, to threaten expressive diversity in the digital age in much the same way that incumbent media has overwhelmingly dominated public discourse in the print and broadcast era. The full abstract and essay can be found here. Posted
9:33 AM
by Neil Netanel [link]
Comments:
I was pleased to find the GWLR article, as well as to learn of the author's work in copyright and first amendment interpretations. First impressions, with respect to news sourcing, include a need to examine the concerns about Google from the political standpoint as a linkage which young web browsers favor compared to old newsprint formats. Additionally, it seems one of the new dynamics in news, while relying centrally perhaps upon the old newsprint media's online publication of investigative and breaking news journalism, is, nevertheless, the historic feature of copyright rules as designed in an era when individual research was much more segmented than in these canine-pack days of howling open source 'development' of new ways to interpret 'news'. Further, there are feedbacks among these antipodes, a synergy, if you will. I suspended writing in locations which consistently resulted in my concepts' appearing in US Senate speeches the following morning without any permissions asked or received; people get paid to write and research at that level. Yet, the entire new media mix is promising, and, the paper published, interesting.
Anybody can sympathize with the sufferings of a friend, but it requires a very fine nature to sympathise with a friend’s success. Agen Judi Online Terpercaya