E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
In response to an ACLU FOIA request for the CIA Inspector General report on interrogation techniques, virtually the only thing the Bush Administration is willing to disclose to the public is that we waterboarded certain detainees. Everything else is redacted. Do they not appreciate how chilling and absurd this is -- that the only thing they're willing to acknowledge is that they committed the most serious war crimes?
With all the red ink expended by George W's Administration on the ever growing budget deficits since Clinton's surplus, where did the Bush Administration find the black ink for all this redacting?
There is already adequate evidence that many detainees have died while under our custody..some violently.
No, waterboarding is a stalking horse; there are worse things we have done, permitted to be done by others acting as our proxies, or done at the final links in the chain of custody.
Perhaps the greatest horrors (and the least defencible) are the outrages perpetrated on those that were in fact entirely innocent ... and those that were killed, rather than compliantly "spilling the beans" so that the maladministratin can at least make the claim: "See! It worked! Look at the lives saved!" (claims that are in themselves rather dubious, not to mention irrelevant as to legality of such).
As in just about every other release of information from this WH, one must always remember that we get the best, not the worst. That means that the redacted items are worse than the waterboarding they are 'fessing up to, and the only reason we know about the waterboard is because the beans were already spilled. How many prisoners have already died that we know about, between Gitmo and Abu Ghraib and Baghram? Lots more than would be killed by this technique alone. So I'll agree Bamage is right.
For shag, the Bushies had to run red ink budgets because they used all the black for redactions and deathless prose arguing executive privilege motions.