Saturday, April 26, 2008
The Sad Decline of the Michigan Law Review's Books Issue
I used to look forward to the annual issue of the Michigan Law Review on "Survey of Books Related to the Law." A real service to scholars I thought. No longer. My area of scholarship is constitutional theory and as far as contheory is concerned the attitude of the last few "Books" issues seems to be: we don't care anymore. The list of significant contheory books not reviewed in MLR has become quite long. Indeed, MLR doesn't seem to be trying -- no longer are there sections dedicated to contheory or even conlaw. Consider some of the better contheory books to be published over the last few years:
I'm curious: which of the books on your list did you offer to review for MLR, only to have your offer turned down? Do you know of other scholars who pitched con-law reviews but were rejected? MLR didn't ask me to review Mark Drumbl's ATROCITY, PUNISHMENT, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW; I pitched it to them.
I think there's real comment to be made about the sad decline of almost every law review in the country, beginning with Harvard and Yale, with regard to the number of reviews they are willing to run. I, of course, have a personal stake in this, so I may be especially sensitive on this point.
In fairness to the Michigan Law Review, I must note that they suggested that Akhil Amar and I in effect review each other's books via an epistolary conversation. It turned out that we didn't have time to do it in a manner satisfactory to us, so the fact that neither of our books was reviewed by Michigan cannot be ascribed wholly to the editors.
One of Mark Graber's many contributions to Balkinization is that he in effect has become a book reviewer, bringing to our attention relevant books that almost certainly will be ignored by contemporary law reviews. We should do more to emulate him on this score.
In my semi-retirement with more time to read (although with weaker eyes), I rely upon Larry Solum's Legal Theory Blog and Mary Dudziak's Legal History Blog for links to SSRN articles that appear more currently than in the law reviews some, or many of them, are headed for. And there is also the H-Net with its reviews. (At times I curse Larry and Mary as my pile of SSRN articles gets higher and higher. But I love what they do.)
Both Paul Horwitz and I (Dan Markel) have registered dissents to this view over at Prawfs.com:
HD kaliteli porno izle ve boşal.
Bayan porno izleme sitesi.
Bedava ve ücretsiz porno izle size gelsin.
Liseli kızların Bedava Porno ve Türbanlı ateşli hatunların sikiş filmlerini izle.
Siyah karanlık odada porno yapan evli çift.
harika Duvar Kağıtları bunlar
tamamen ithal duvar kağıdı olanlar var
2013 Beyaz Eşya modeller
Sizlere Güvenlik Sistemleri ayarliyoruz
Arayin Hırdavat bulun
Samsung Nokia İphone Cep telefonu alin.
Super Led Tv keyfi
Amatör Porno - Amcik Porno - Anal Porno - Asyali Porno - Bakire Porno - Erotik Porno - Esmer Porno - Fantazi Porno - Gay Porno - Götten Porno - Grup Porno - Hard Porno - HD Porno - Hemsire Porno - Latin Porno - Lezbiyen Porno - Liseli Porno - Olgun Porno - Oral Porno - Rokettube - Sarisin Porno - Sert Porno - Tecavüz Porno - Travesti Porno - Türbanli Porno - Türk Porno - Ünlü Porno - Yasli Porno - Zenci Porno - Kari Koca Porno - Hayvanli Porno
thanks so much i like very so much your postPost a Comment
حلي الاوريو الفطر الهندي صور تورتة حلى قهوه طريقة عمل السينابون طريقة عمل بلح الشام بيتزا هت كيكة الزبادي حلا سهل صور كيك عجينة العشر دقائق طريقة عمل الدونات طريقة عمل البان كيك طريقة عمل الكنافة طريقة عمل البسبوسة طريقة عمل الكيك طريقة عمل عجينة البيتزا فوائد القرفه