E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
The frightening thing about such acts of renaming or euphemism, Tacitus implies, is their power to efface the memory of actual cruelties. Behind the façade of a history falsified by language, the painful particulars of war are lost. Maybe the most disturbing implication of the famous sentence "They create a desolation and call it peace" is that apologists for violence, by means of euphemism, come to believe what they hear themselves say.
Or euphemism can be made to amplify or create painful particulars where none exist...civil war, quagmire, quisling regime, broken army, death squads, extreme violence, war is lost, and of course the old chesnut of comparing US troops to Nazis.
Or euphemism can be made to amplify or create painful particulars where none exist...civil war, quagmire, quisling regime, broken army, death squads, extreme violence, war is lost
# posted by Bart DePalma : 1:31 PM
Baghdad, my favorite euphemisms were "insurgency" and "looting". Remember when warmongering assholes like you mocked the people who said the Iraqis were looting. And then when shit started blowing up you mocked people who said there was an insurgency. Good times...
Unfortunately, those were the good times, and your "euphamisms" are the current reality.
Seriously, we are 5 years into a war that was supposed to last 6 weeks, and there is no end in sight. You must have a creative definition for quagmire if it doesn't describe the situation in Iraq.
Euphemisms are, by definition, substituted for the purpose of ameliorating the offensiveness of the original expression. Dysphemism is the word you are looking for, but you still wouldn't be using it correctly. You are merely describing exaggeration or, perhaps, mischaracterization.
euphemism: The act or an example of substituting an accurate term - though harsh, blunt, or offensive - for one that is mild, indirect, or vague, and chosen to mislead or deceive: "devastate" is a euphemism for "liberate".
Thank you for this article. I want to comment on one part:
This complacency suggests a new innocence—the correlative in moral psychology of euphemism in the realm of language. And if you take stock of how little general discussion there has been of the advisability of pursuing the global war on terrorism, you realize that this country has scarcely begun to take stock of the United States as an ambiguous actor on the world stage. Those who said, in the weeks just after the September 11 attacks, that the motives of the terrorists might be traced back to some US policies in the Middle East were understandably felt to have spoken unseasonably.
What was unseasonable was assuming the identity of the terrorists before proven. I made that mistake:
The author uses the word "catastrophe" about 9/11. This is a euphemism, or an obfuscation, that I often see used by liberal commentators on 9/11. The word "catastrophe" obfuscates the criminal nature and agency of the acts.