Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Linkless
|
Saturday, March 01, 2008
Linkless
Marty Lederman
Virtually every newspaper and wire service has a story today about Attorney General Mukasey's letter to Speaker Pelosi yesterday, in which he refuses to permit the U.S. Attorney to refer the Miers and Bolten contempt citations to a federal grand jury. And yet, as far as I can tell, none of the media sources, nor any of the obvious web sites, contains a link to the letter itself. It's not posted on the DOJ website, nor on the Speaker's web sites, nor on the House Judiciary Committee site. [UPDATE: The House Judiciary Committee graciously provided the letter to me on March 3d. I discuss it here.]
Comments:
I looked for it too and couldn't find it. One would also think that both DOJ and the Speaker would have posted it.
I think this site has a transcript of the letter you guys are talking about.
http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=1171
thanks, cflb, but we're looking not for Pelosi's letter, but for Mukasey's letter in response to Pelosi. I didn't see it there.
This is the same information as the commenter, above, adding links:
UPI published an unbylined article Friday evening which includes excerpts the news services are publishing: << Citing a 1984 department opinion, Mukasey said "the Department of Justice's longstanding position taken during administrations of both parties is 'that the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an executive branch official who asserts the president's claim of executive privilege.'" Mukasey said the department "has determined that the non-compliance by Mr. Bolten and Ms. Miers ... did not constitute a crime" and would not bring the contempt citations before a grand jury or take any other steps to prosecute Bolten or Miers. >> AP's Laurie Kellman similarly has a few excerpts published yesterday. Yet another source seems to paraphrase a little more closely, but only in a fragmentary way: << Mukasey also cited in his letter a-1984 justice opinion stating, 'that the contempt of Congress statute was not intended to apply and could not constitutionally be applied to an executive branch official who asserts the president's claim of executive privilege." >> But ML is right, evidently: no copy of the letter which the Speaker received is public yet.
I know I'm not a great law perfesser from a 60 grand a year law school but the obvious circle jerk that keeps going around and coming around seems so glaring here that it's amazing that isn't the key point of focus. Here we have the supposed "left" leaning San Francisco Democrat (sic) Speaker of the House of Representatives quoting a wire service article about a letter she supposedly received from the current Attorney General. She got the letter but she's quoting a reporter on the letter. Friday release is the Republican game but the Pelosi circle jerk is a Democrat return and we the people are the ball.
Do a google search on some of the quotes from the Harry Potter cloaked letter and you'll see that the exact same quotes were used months ago. .................................................. President Bush Tells Congress, Because I Said So: Ann Woolner Tuesday, July 24, 2007 By Ann Woolner Bloomberg.com: Opinion http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aF3Z9PywX480&refer=home [dead link] http://political-pundit-place.blogspot.com/2007/07/bloombergcom-opinion.html .................................................. It isn't even a case of WHY???!!! the Democrats have waited so long to try to implement their subpoenas. That seems much more timed to fail but appear to have represented a fight of some sorts, gallantly losing in the end. "Inherent contempt," which doesn't require the executive office to effect its mandate isn't mentioned, much less considered. That might actually force the situation rather than be a grandiose failure. But forcing the situation is the last things these Democrats want. Really now! Let's have another series of posts on how the U.S. Constitution has failed the people. It's amazing to me that no one has pointed out that the problem with the U.S. Constitution is that it's just a piece of paper and doesn't have extending electrodes wired into the asses of the political leaders to get them to actually do something other than stage bullshit photo-ops. Chuck Schumer could certainly use a few high voltage electrodes up his ass. I say that with the kindest of intentions and certainly not as a torture proposal. It should be a job requirement. Dick Cheney and George W. Bush are not sophisticated legal debaters. They're dark alley thugs. It's "you and what army" logic. I've posted this long ago and it's still starkly, glaringly obvious. They have control of the actual army and they have control of the national policing apparatus. Any weaknesses in that control are quickly removed, whether it's the generals that we should all listen to and STFU or the great legal minds that come up with the likes of the "torture memos." If they don't follow the route of enabling and legitimizing thugs (and "thugs' seems a compliment considering the war criminal behavior) they're gonzo. The great champions of the people, like Goldstein and Comey and even Fitzgerald, have done nothing to stop the relentless march of dollars and death towards fascism. They've merely covered their asses in the very unlikely case that the shit might some day hit the fan. But let's face it. They haven't defended the nation and its laws and its people though they may have posted here as if they have. What does it matter what the minutiae of the letter is? Karl Rove said you people would endlessly debate the details of his and his henchmen's actions and he was right. He knows your kind. He's seen the tea and crumpets discussions while he was likely planning planting pedophilia stories about political opponents. These people ream the nation while you people consider the surface texture of the toilet bowl plunger handle. Electrodes! I say the constitution needs to have articles of electrodes! Ugh! I wish I could say I feel better. Where's the Tylenol? Can't take aspirin. Carry on. I'm sure there's some gem of a phrase of great concern in Mukasey's letter that should warrant a couple of dozen posts here.
I'd like a link to that 1984 opinion too, as well as independent descriptions of the fact pattern and procedural stance associated with the opinion.
. Some of the history is in a 2001 article by David Neiwert, "The first Ted Olson scandal.
I posted and discussed the 1984 OLC Opinion here:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/07/why-us-attorney-will-not-prosecute.html
The Unitary Executive theory is offered far too often in arguments over issues to which it does not apply, However, while I doubt Mukasey used this term, this is precisely the kind of congressional overreach to which the Unitary Executive theory was meant to apply.
Under the UE theory, Congress does not have the power to deputize DOJ to prosecute the President on its behalf. In other words, the legislature cannot force a unified executive to prosecute itself. After this predictable rebuff, Congress is finally getting around to what it should have done from the outset - bring suit in court. Of course, this has nothing at all to do with the law and everything with motivating the Dem base for the elections. Any doubt about this was dispelled when the Dems got on record wanting this law suit resolved before November.
Actually, doubt that the dispute is politically motivated was raised, not dispelled by the comments about wanting it settled by November. The last thing you want, when running on an issue, is to have the issue resolved before the election.
c2h50h:
I did not say that Dems were acting wisely in this regard, merely that they are acting politically. I have seen very little wisdom out of this last Congress, which has managed the neat trick of alienating half of its own party as well as everyone else.
Bart,
So, if I interpret your comment correctly, it's your opinion that, when the Democrats do something that appears not politically motivated, then they're "not wise", while, if they do anything else, it's automatically political. How convenient for you that this automatically means they're either stupid, or dishonest, or both. I'm continually amazed by the certainty with which you deliver these opinions. I've heard the Pope deliver pronouncements with more nuance than you do, and on matters on which he could be considered expert. I don't believe in telepathy, and long-range telepathy is the only way you could really be sure of that which you proclaim. Frankly, my own opinion is that you don't have the chops for your opinion on the wisdom of Congress to carry any weight.
I apologize for going slightly off topic, but I thought this might be of interest to Marty and others while we are discussing the political wars between the Dem Congress and Mr. Bush.
It appears that the House Dem Leadership is going to cave and offer the Senate FISA reform bill in two parts so Dem members on the left can vote to gut FISA while also voting against telecom immunity in an effort to satisfy the base and everyone else. More likely, Pelosi and Reyes ham handed mishandling of this issue will alienate both the base and everyone else.
another off-topic comment. Check out this layman Canadian view of US justice under Mukasey - the Globe and Mail editorial.
asnice i like your blog
Post a Comment
very very nice nice blog blog have written. create website, SEO, classified, blogs, backlinks m11.in online games, forum, music website,
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |