| Balkinization   |
|
Balkinization
|
Monday, February 18, 2008
Sock Puppets Explain Neoliberalism, Channel Deleuze
JB
Comments:
Here's sublation for you: The three guys from Office Space whaling on Kiki and Bubu's iPhone with a baseball bat. There's a reclamation of post-disciplinary solidarity for you.
Ahem. At the risk of being both intelligible and nostalgic, it reminds me of a time not so long ago when I bust Professor Bainbridge's chops over his inane crowing about "The Ownership Society," pointing out how well the rhetoric of "the workers own the means of production" worked out for the USSR. Fun, sometimes, turning things on their heads.
As for the Porn Monster, remember the Gallagher joke, "Sex is like a Chinese dinner: It isn't over 'til you've both had your cookies"? Or was Porn Monster a representation of the collective unconscious as manifest in spammed viagra ads and the coming panopticon fueled by indiscriminate browser cookie acceptance? Either way, glad to see the academic tenor of this hitchin' post kept tip top. Thanks, Prof!
Are self-motivated knowledge workers still tools of the capitalist classes?
Short answer: Yes. Long Answer: So long as those workers exist in a society that either A. Has no space for them to share and expose how their ignorant co-workers are actually doing themselves harm, or B. Similar to the status quo, despite the workers having the information avalible to them as to why they are tools of their employers, they chose to ignore it; then they will forever still be tools of the capitalist society because they have failed to accomplish anything with their newly acquired knowledge. Although, that does presume that the workers are tools for continuing to be motivated by their bosses. This is where the video is wrong. In a capitalist society, workers who chose not to be productive at work harm themselves in multiple ways. First, they destroy the product they manufacture. This means that customers will be getting an inferior product, either driving prices and therefore profits down, or the company will lose business, killing profits equally. What to executives do when profits shrink? They cut benefits, decrease wages, and lay off workers. That hurts them. Second, it means that there exists at least one job that could be filled with an unemployed person, the job of the employee who fails to use their best labor. This means that they lose money to the state to take care of the unemployed person who would have taken that job.
I thought (metaphorically speaking) it had more to do with the anonymous pedestrian nature of the mass-produced Sock requiring individuation as the product of a theater seamstress’s labors (theater a hotbed of heightened individuation) by which the anonymous incommunicable, the inchoate mumbling of the vox populi (points for latin?) being enabled through individual craft in isolation to become a fit tool for corporate communication willy-nilly.
Create or die. Create and die. It’s all a big Samsara Chimera..commercial? What’s sublation¿ Phelan didn’t say anything about it. Does this count?
Porny’s eyes are backwards, a post-symbolic reification of unskilled feral and flawed production unworthy of a mature market fluttering at the socks’ feet like a wounded bird or bubbling eager protoplasm, a bouncing baby life force. Animal vitality netted by marketing. Commerce unter alles.
Post-Stalinist -Greenspanist -trichotimist determinism veiled by rhetoric referencing stochastic statistically accurate meta-analyses.
Rambling Interminable Babble™ representing the proto-product of late-Post-Intellectual Society™? A job in Publicity? Campaign management?
I thought porn monster represented the new opiate of the masses, substituting religious authority for narcotic entertainment experiences-- and, unlike television, isolating the individual from the collective? Notice how it wrests control of their source of information from then and brings the discussion to an end.
Jack, I cannot even put a file on my virtual desk!
Truly, any office "worker" (in the private sector, evidently) who thought that they had some kind of controlling ownership in the business was quickly disabused of the notion when Windows 2000 enacted security groups. controlling what we did and in turn shouldering more responsibility was always about improving service to boost profits, not sharing them. We workers understood that, though evidently false consciousness scholars didn't. Windows 95 made that happen at an exciting pace. It was fun being able to do things for people without having to ask permission. But as the Mergers and Acquisitions raised proprietary issues, the heat was on Microsoft to clamp down on the files. But even now, I would prefer to serve customers without having to differ to some dumb union boss playing pecking order games with me. But unfortunately, NT 5.0 re-introduced those hierarchical obsessions (if not took them to pathological extremes) i.e., the nouns before verbs politics and, not surprisingly, productivity is slowing down.
Casino Bonuses – Keeping it Straight Ya’ll
Post a Comment
Give me a break, everyone that is posting about free casino bonuses, please be accurate. There are such things as no deposit bonuses however, they usually amount to 15-25 bucks a pop. The bigger bonuses that everyone keeps rambling about are given only upon making an initial deposit with the online casino, which has minimum requirements that should be met for the player to actually collect the bonus. My recommendation is to read the promotions page extremely carefully and understand all the conditions for being eligible for collecting the different bonuses. My 2cents. Peace Out.
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers
Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009)
Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009)
Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009)
Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) Neil Netanel, Copyright's Paradox (Oxford Univ. Press 2008)
David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007)
Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007)
Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006)
Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006)
Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006)
Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005)
Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |