Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts Mitt meditates on Martin Luther King
|
Monday, January 21, 2008
Mitt meditates on Martin Luther King
Sandy Levinson
Mitt Romney issued the following message concerning Martin Luther King: Every now and then I guess we all think realistically (Yes, sir) about that day when we will be victimized with what is life's final common denominator—that something that we call death. We all think about it. And every now and then I think about my own death and I think about my own funeral. And I don't think of it in a morbid sense. And every now and then I ask myself, "What is it that I would want said?" And I leave the word to you this morning. If any of you are around when I have to meet my day, I don’t want a long funeral. And if you get somebody to deliver the eulogy, tell them not to talk too long. (Yes) And every now and then I wonder what I want them to say. Tell them not to mention that I have a Nobel Peace Prize—that isn’t important. Tell them not to mention that I have three or four hundred other awards—that’s not important. Tell them not to mention where I went to school. (Yes) I'd like somebody to mention that day that Martin Luther King, Jr., tried to give his life serving others. (Yes) I'd like for somebody to say that day that Martin Luther King, Jr., tried to love somebody. Secondly, although it's true at one level that King "proved that one man with a dream can make a difference," it's even more true, I think, to say that he proved that one man with a dream who was capable of invigorating a mass movement that, among other things, engaged in civil disobedience and social disruption, could make a difference (especially with the ultimate support of such a visionary president as Lyndon B. Johnson). It is important to honor King, but it may be even more important to honor the far more anonymous, equally courageous, African-Americans (and, yes, white Americans) who put their bodies on the line and, in some cases, equally paid with their lives for daring to believe in the Declaration of Independence and its promise of equality (a promise strikingly lacking in our 1787 Constitution, as Thurgood Marshall explained during the Bicentennial). A drum major needs a marching band behind him (or her). Otherwise s/he is merely a tragic (or, indeed, ridiculous and self-deluded) figure. In honoring the drum major, we should honor his magnificent band as well, for they made Martin Luther King Day possible. My wife was in Birmingham last week interviewing now-middle-aged adults who 45 years ago participated in the "children's march" in Birmingham that, by drawing the crazed response from Bull Connor, finally moved the otherwise indifferent John F. Kennedy to recognize what was happening and to move toward introducing his Civil Rights Bill (that Johnson in fact got passed). Several of them, including one women who was eight years old at the time, recalled that King was capable through his quiet eloquence of dampening their own fears and creating what to me was an almost literally incredible sense of calm and inner peace. (That particular eighth-year-old spent a week in jail before being released.) And, lest we forget, he emphasized, above all, love and non-violence (notions that today seem to most of us the equivalent of "fairy tales") . Mitt is surely not the only American who should ponder the implications of the truly radical figure who was Martin Luther King.
Comments:
I don't think the "revealed truth" description is accurate. MLK was more concerned that all men are treated equally than created equally.
Prof. Levinson:
First, though Dr King no doubt believed in "liberty," I think it's fair to say that he defined himself primarily in terms of a striving for social justice, which is equivalent to liberty only among devoted libertarians. Indeed. And also the real message of Christ ("What you do to the least of us, you do to me" and "turn the other cheek"). JC was a revolutionary in many ways. At the time of his assassination, MLKII had also touched on the ar in Vietnam. I blogged a bit of one speech of his three years ago on MLK Day. Cheers,
BTW, "turn the other cheek" is not the same as "Go in the fetal position"....
"Turn the other cheek" is an active response, not a passive one. In doing so, you take control of yourself, and of the situation. Cheers,
BTW, "turn the other cheek" is not the same as "Go in the fetal position"....
"Turn the other cheek" is an active response, not a passive one. In doing so, you take control of yourself, and of the situation. Turning the other cheek is a most subtle act of defiance. Presumably the person who hit you in the face was trying either to intimidate you or to provoke a fight. By turning the other cheek you are refusing to play the other person's script and offering a most unexpected response. A sort of moral judo.
Professor Levinson:
During MLK day, we in the GOP and I dare say most Americans are celebrating only one dimension of a sanitized King - the belief so eloquently expressed in the DC "I have a dream' speech that people should be judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. In fact, as you note, King ended up being a far more radical figure, supporting racial preferences, socialism, forced redistribution of wealth and attacks in US "militarism." Folks like Romney concentrate on the Dream because they do no support any of the rest of King's agenda. Romney would not be caught dead using the liberal spin term "social justice" because those who believe in liberty and anyone who has lived under actual socialism knows that there is nothing "just" about government force compelled theft from disfavored groups to favored groups.
Folks like Romney concentrate on the Dream because they do no support any of the rest of King's agenda.
Great. Would be nice if they would be honest and up-front about it then, and say that they like the "Dream" speech and think he's a fine orator and yes, we should be for equality and not caring about skin colour and all, but all that other cr*p that MLKII was trying to do was commie ... and didn'cha know he was a <*PSSST!sotto voce*> ... adulterous satyr, Hoover's got the tapes to prove it.... Doubt it, though. My post on MLKII day three years ago (see link above) gives a bit more rounded picture of the man. King ended up being a far more radical figure.... Yeah. I noted that too. "Bart" wants to ignore my take on that. Cheers,
picking up on nal's comment, mitt's use of "revealed" is also notably sloppy. i'm fairly certain that the truth that all men are created equal didn't have to wait for the Declaration to be 'revealed' - especially given that jefferson and the other founders almost certainly didn't have black people in mind when they wrote those words.
"Would be nice if they would be honest and up-front about it then,"
Romney is a politician, and politicians are not honest and up front about the clay feet of people the public, for better or worse, idolize. An honest and up front response to MLK day would assure Romney's defeat. Better to remember the admirable stage of MLK's career, and gloss over the latter part.
Brett:
An honest and up front response to MLK day would assure Romney's defeat. Why, pray tell? Not enough Republicans around? Better to remember the admirable stage of MLK's career, and gloss over the latter part. Why, pray tell? Is it really a good strategy to be dishonest in the quest for power? Ummm ... hmmm ... Dubya ... oh, right, silly question. Cheers,
"Is it really a good strategy to be dishonest in the quest for power?"
In a moral sense? Of course not. Does it work? On the evidence, yes. I'm explaining why Romney is doing what he's doing, not endorsing it. Try to be honest about public icons like MLK, and the media will crucify you. The media likes their plaster saints whitewashed.
I'm a white american and I love that MLK ended up supporting racial preferences, socialism, and reparations.
Last I knew Mitt, he was ranting and raving and trying to reverse same-sex marriage in Massachusetts. Although I understand that these days he is playing moderate to trick you all.
By my count, King's "I have a dream" speech refers to "free" or "freedom" 25 times. He began by describing the march as "the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation." Perhaps he should have chosen different words?
(It's probably true that it wasn't a value emphasized by the later King--a figure who was much more radical than the King of 1963. But there's certainly nothing wrong with honoring a particular vision of King--whether it's the one Sandy likes or the one Mitt likes.)
151216meiqing
hollister clothing oakley sunglasses kate spade handbags oakley sunglasses louis vuitton outlet michael kors outlet online michael kors outlet online michael kors outlet louis vuitton handbags hollister co abercrombie coach factory outlet coach outlet gucci shoes jordans beats by dre michael kors outlet online cheap oakleys louis vuitton purses cheap toms shoes giuseppe zanotti sneakers nike air max canada goose jackets ed hardy clothing ugg outlet michael kors oakley sunglasses wholesale uggs on sale timberland boots michael kors handbags coach outlet online michael kors outlet nike air huarache coach factory outlet louboutin pas cher louis vuitton outlet pandora jewelry michael kors handbags ugg slippers
I choose you. And I'll choose you over and over and over. Without pause, without a doubt, in a heartbeat. I'll keep choosing you.
Post a Comment
Agen Judi Online Terpercaya
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |