E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Public Reason, an open blog which invites contribution from "[a]ll bona fide full-time professional academic political philosophers and theorists," has begun postings. The blog states that "Our only restrictions are that participants must have completed their Ph.D. studies in a relevant discipline and be full-time professional academics working in political philosophy or theory."
The idea of an "open blog" that invites contributions from anyone teaching in a particular academic specialty is a very interesting idea. If anyone knows of open blogs for the legal academy with similar rules, please mention them in the comments. Posted
11:52 AM
by JB [link]
paul johnson wrote in modern times and intellectuals... one of the principal lessons of our tragic century which has seen so many millions of innocent lives sacrificed in schemes to improve the lot of humanity is this, BEWARE INTELLECTUALS, not merely should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advise, beware committees conferences and leagues of intellectuals, distrust their public statements issued from their serried ranks, discount their verdicts on political leaders and important events. For intellectual far from being highly individualistic and non conformist people follow certain regular patterns of behavior, taken as a group they are often ultra conformist within the circles formed by those whose approval they seek and value, that is what makes them en masse so dangerous, for it enables them to create climates of opinion and prevailing orthodoxes which themselves often generate irrational and destructive causes of action. Above all we must at all times remember what intellectuals habitually forget that people matter more than concepts and must come first, the worst of all despotisms is the heartless tyranny of ideas.
John Ralson Saul makes several points similar to Vincent in Voltaire's Bastards. There are undoubtedly some writers without the necessary academic credentials or specialization who could contribute great things to this site.
Art and literature have been increasingly produced for smaller and smaller academic and critical communities with the result that they have become all but inaccessible to "ordinary" mortals. Not to mention irrelevant.
One of the reasons I like Balkinization is that it is pretty approachable.
One of the central causes of civic disengagement is a surrender to a tyranny of expertise.
I think open blogs are very common, albiet not usually referred to as such.
Usually they're in the form of discussion boards or or forums.
I regularly post on a number of political or legal related discussion boards. On most of them anyone who has participated long enough to gain the required standing may post a new article.
Although, the idea of a discussion board where there is a substantial requirement to post is an interesting idea. It would concieveably lead to much higher quality discussion among the primary posters.
"Our only restrictions are that participants must have completed their Ph.D. studies in a relevant discipline and be full-time professional academics working in political philosophy or theory."
This says a lot about how our political culture functions, even at its self-proclaimed summit. I've written on public reason here at Balkinization, been thanked for what I had to say, even drew a concurrence on the topic from a Harvard philosophy professor. Yet I don't qualify to take part in "Public Reason." Why is unimportant, and I feel no great loss. What matters is that this site is about as accurately branded as Fox News. It is an outlet for academics who can't answer to anyone outside their circle and so won't: a cloister with a picture window.
The site meets a professional need. Whether it serves public reason is another matter, one the site will never broach. The insulation resembles what I encountered on the subject of how Senators should question judicial nominees in light of a Supreme Court precedent squarely on point, as I describe just below under Chris Eisgruber's "What the Senate Should Do?" Both this and that comment strike the same chord, on the hazards of leaving the matter of our governance in "the best of hands."
I am the community manager at www.pronetos.com, we are providing a collaboration and networking venue for professors, researchers and graduate students. The community is creating self-defining groups that are interested in developing a discussion in particular disciplines. These are in effect "open blogs" that allow participants to interact with there peers from across the globe.
The best love is the kind that awakens the soul; that makes us reach for more, that plants the fire in our hearts and brings peace to our minds. That’s what I hope to give you forever. Agen Judi Online Terpercaya