Balkinization   |
Balkinization
Balkinization Symposiums: A Continuing List                                                                E-mail: Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu David Luban david.luban at gmail.com Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu Compendium of posts on Hobby Lobby and related cases The Anti-Torture Memos: Balkinization Posts on Torture, Interrogation, Detention, War Powers, and OLC The Anti-Torture Memos (arranged by topic) Recent Posts And Now for Some Random News about Nola
|
Sunday, September 09, 2007
And Now for Some Random News about Nola
Stephen Griffin
Several articles this weekend intersected and yielded some insights about New Orleans in the shadow of NYC's recovery after 9/11. There was a September 8 AP story comparing planning efforts in the two cities. NYC has had problems building on ground zero, but more success in the neighborhoods close by. Planning efforts in Nola started and stopped at least three times, hobbled by lack of funding. But the sort of funding available to NYC has been largely unknown in Nola. Today's NYT had an article on a neighborhood comeback near ground zero, below Chambers Street.
Comments:
Stephen--you are right, except that news about NOLA is not random. It is one of the most important things in our country.
What is happening (or not) in NOLA is not random, it is the result of deliberate federal neglect. I've spent a month doing recovery work there. Residents, neighborhood and community organizations, and volunteers are doing remarkable and courageous work to rebuild. I haven't seen much of the government, except that it is creating enormous bureaucratic obstructions that are getting in the way of relief. Most everything that only government can do is either not being done or is being done badly. As I'm sure you know, even in the areas where substantial federal funds have been dedicated--levee protection, insurance, homeowner compensation--money allocated has been slow to arrive. All of these problems still exist. Even levee protection, where the greatest amount of funding has gotten to where it is needed on the ground, is uncertain. There is no substitute for resources, and those resources are money, manpower and organized, efficient government administration of both. There's not enough of any of those resources in the Gulf, and that is because the federal government in general and the President in particular do not care enough to get them there. Of course there are historic, systemic, and physical obstacles to recovery. Any sensible recovery plan must consider these obstacles and include solutions that take them into account. But if violence, corruption, past mistakes and antiquated infrastructure were reasons to give up on large government projects, we'd not be in Iraq. If the President cared as much about the Gulf Coast as the Persian Gulf, and was willing to take the lead in dedicating the federal resources needed to succeed, the Gulf Coast would be in much better shape than it is today. The moral and political argument for a more robust federally led recovery plan is inconstestable, because the federal government is responsible for the vast majority of the flooding caused by poorly built levees and wetlands deterioration. The neglect of the Gulf Coast and its residents is shameful. Hopefully it will end, because the work people there have done on their own is inspiring. It's sad that their government isn't as good as they are. Maybe its naive, but the America I believed in would not let this stand. I always thought that if something this awful happened, we'd all be in it together and for each other. After the horrific images of the post-flood crisis, I really believed that we'd apply our know-how and make the restoration of the area and its people a top national priority. If we don't make things right, we're not really much of a country, are we? Charlie Martel
The comparison of NYC and NOLA does not exactly shed a more flattering light on the corruption and incompetence of NOLA and LA in general. NYC cleaned up, planned and started rebuilding right from the start. Years down the road, NOLA still cannot even agree on a redevelopment plan while billions of dollars of federal assistance wait to be spent.
BTW, there is no direct square mile comparison between the costs to rebuild a Manhattan and NOLA. Manhattan is far more concentrated and far more expensive to rebuild. NOLA simply cannot make a decision on how and whether to rebuild its suburbs. The problem is definitely NOT a lack of our tax money. The hurricane recovery effort down there is currently five times as large as any previous effort and will get larger. You will notice that, apart from a great deal of hot air on the subject, the Dem Congress is not exactly rushing down to throw more money down to NOLA. If you want to make an apt comparison, you may want to measure NOLA's awful record with that of Haley Barbour's Mississippi recovering from the same storm. Indeed, the comparison is so embarrassing to the Dems defending NOLA, that they have stooped to trying to paint Barbour with the corruption brush because they cannot fault his stellar performance. Even assuming that Barbour was corrupt, that only makes NOLA corrupt and incompetent.
I agree that it is not only intentional neglect, it is far more strategic than people can imagine. At the outset, there were certain calls made that favored private equity over public. New Orleans attempted to open broadband in the central city area, to facilitate communications, it would have enhanced rebuilding networks, especially volunteer groups, but it never happened. Every neighborhood should have had a police substation to provide security for families rebuilding, but security is the largest problem in New Orleans and the biggest hindrance for those isolated in their neighborhoods. Families who want to come back to rebuild are afraid to be the only ones on their block.
In many towns along the Coast, public services are working out of tents and trailers, and there is no sign of rebuilding public infrastructure. The burden of reconstruction has fallen totally on the goodwill of strangers, and the whims of speculators and developers. Those least able to shoulder the burdens are scapegoated and left to the FEMA parks. The FEMA trailer parks are dangerous gulags where single moms and elderly live side by side with meth addicts and other criminal elements. It became apparent early on that their was a directed attempt to manipulate the economic pattern of the Coast. Volunteer organizations that gave "free" consumer goods, such as tools or meals were shut down and instructed to concentrate on labor (more dangerous for volunteers to do rather than run soup kitchens) I wonder if those early rulemakers though it would actually discourage volunteers form helping at all, thankfully there have since been a steady stream of people, notably Samaritans purse, Catholic Charities, Habitat for Humanity, and many others who have had to work according to some arbitrary guidelines set in the early days after Katrina. Every day since Katrina there have been obvious abuses and indignities heaped upon the citizens who live along the Gulf Coast. Curfews, changing regulations and code enforcement, permitting requirements, En masse destruction of public housing and subsidized housing on often drier and higher land. (possibly to be sold to developers once the clearance is given) Because of the lack of housing, casinos, rather than raise wages have turned to increased immigrant labor. Not the front desk people, but cleaning staff, kitchen help, all the people you do not see. The casinos maintain their visas and contractors are paid to house them. The workers come from all over the world, although it appears the majority are Latino/Hispanic or Asian. The wages are lower than they should be for an area that has lost much of it's workforce, so the effect overall is that as cost of living skyrockets along the Coast due to increased insurance, loss of equity, limited services, wages are suppressed. While Houston complains about the "refugees" they took in from New Orleans, they forget to mention that many of the offices of major firms along the Coast and New Orleans relocated to Houston. What I believe, is that those who help rebuild the Coast, out of spite, or in spite of the hardships we face, are rebels to the disaster. We know this could happen anywhere. We know it is the prototype for the next disaster, whether it be natural or unnatural.
Steve,
I am curious as to why Mary Landrieu is said to be in trouble re next year's Senate election. One might think that no sane Louisianan would vote for a Republican, given the party's hostility to the very idea that government can be an effective provider of anything other than military weapons and the linked hostility to programs directed at the economic interests of the working class. And, of course, Vitter has been exposed as yet one more sanctimonious hypocrite on the "social issues," even as almost all Republicans have remained silent, in marked contrast to the hysteric reaction to Larry Craig. So why is Landrieu vulnerable?
Just in response to Sandy:
Post a Comment
Keep in mind that Landrieu won office in 1996 and reelection in 2002 only by narrow margins. In fact, her margin of victory both times was probably provided by African American voters in New Orleans parish. So there is a Katrina connection. Conservative democrats like Bennett Johnston and John Breaux have won in La. but only by co-opting some of the Republican vote. It's been harder for Landrieu to do that, I'm not sure why, since she is pro-life etc. Republicans in La. of course support Katrina aid for the state, provided it doesn't flow solely to Nola. They have an odds-on favorite to win the election for governor this year in Bobby Jindal. After all, Dems led the state through Katrina in Gov. Blanco and Mayor Nagin, but weren't perceived as doing a good job.
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Linda C. McClain and Aziza Ahmed, The Routledge Companion to Gender and COVID-19 (Routledge, 2024) David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024) Jack M. Balkin, Memory and Authority: The Uses of History in Constitutional Interpretation (Yale University Press, 2024) Mark A. Graber, Punish Treason, Reward Loyalty: The Forgotten Goals of Constitutional Reform after the Civil War (University of Kansas Press, 2023) Jack M. Balkin, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision - Revised Edition (NYU Press, 2023) Andrew Koppelman, Burning Down the House: How Libertarian Philosophy Was Corrupted by Delusion and Greed (St. Martin’s Press, 2022) Gerard N. Magliocca, Washington's Heir: The Life of Justice Bushrod Washington (Oxford University Press, 2022) Joseph Fishkin and William E. Forbath, The Anti-Oligarchy Constitution: Reconstructing the Economic Foundations of American Democracy (Harvard University Press, 2022) Mark Tushnet and Bojan Bugaric, Power to the People: Constitutionalism in the Age of Populism (Oxford University Press 2021). Mark Philip Bradley and Mary L. Dudziak, eds., Making the Forever War: Marilyn B. Young on the Culture and Politics of American Militarism Culture and Politics in the Cold War and Beyond (University of Massachusetts Press, 2021). Jack M. Balkin, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Same-Sex Marriage Decision (Yale University Press, 2020) Frank Pasquale, New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI (Belknap Press, 2020) Jack M. Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020) Mark Tushnet, Taking Back the Constitution: Activist Judges and the Next Age of American Law (Yale University Press 2020). Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs. Religious Liberty?: The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020) Ezekiel J Emanuel and Abbe R. Gluck, The Trillion Dollar Revolution: How the Affordable Care Act Transformed Politics, Law, and Health Care in America (PublicAffairs, 2020) Linda C. McClain, Who's the Bigot?: Learning from Conflicts over Marriage and Civil Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2020) Sanford Levinson and Jack M. Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019) Sanford Levinson, Written in Stone: Public Monuments in Changing Societies (Duke University Press 2018) Mark A. Graber, Sanford Levinson, and Mark Tushnet, eds., Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) Gerard Magliocca, The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights became the Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2018) Cynthia Levinson and Sanford Levinson, Fault Lines in the Constitution: The Framers, Their Fights, and the Flaws that Affect Us Today (Peachtree Publishers, 2017) Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) Sanford Levinson, Nullification and Secession in Modern Constitutional Thought (University Press of Kansas 2016) Sanford Levinson, An Argument Open to All: Reading The Federalist in the 21st Century (Yale University Press 2015) Stephen M. Griffin, Broken Trust: Dysfunctional Government and Constitutional Reform (University Press of Kansas, 2015) Frank Pasquale, The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information (Harvard University Press, 2015) Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press, 2014) Balkinization Symposium on We the People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution Joseph Fishkin, Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity (Oxford University Press, 2014) Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2013) John Mikhail, Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls' Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment (Cambridge University Press, 2013) Gerard N. Magliocca, American Founding Son: John Bingham and the Invention of the Fourteenth Amendment (New York University Press, 2013) Stephen M. Griffin, Long Wars and the Constitution (Harvard University Press, 2013) Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013) James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012) Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012) Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012) Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012) Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011) Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011) Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011) Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011) Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011) Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010) Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010) Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010) Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010) Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009) Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009) Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009) Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009) Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009) Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007) Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006) Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006) Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006) Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006) Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006) Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005) Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |