E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Even momentous decisions got terse treatment. Writing on the day he nominated Sandra Day O'Connor to the Supreme Court, Reagan said: "Already the flack is starting & from my own supporters. Rite to Life people say she's pro-abortion. She declares abortion is personally repugnant to her. I think she'll make a good Justice."
This comports with much of what we already knew about the O'Connor nomination. For Reagan, it was less important that O'Connor had publicly opposed Roe v. Wade than that O'Connor was personally opposed to abortion, that she was a fellow Westerner, that she was likely to be very strong on federalism issues, and above all, that she was a woman who would help him fulfill his 1980 campaign promise to appoint the first female Supreme Court Justice.
Reagan probably wanted to overturn Roe v. Wade, but it was a goal that he was willing to trade off for other political and legal considerations. His larger purpose was to replace more liberal jurists with more conservative ones, and shift the general direction of the courts rightward. In this task he largely succeeded, but political considerations inevitably tempered his decisionmaking. As a result, although O'Connor was a more conservative Justice than Justice Stewart (whom she replaced), and although she shifted doctrine rightward during the 1980's and early 1990's (she was the fifth vote in Bowers and the key federalism decisions, and she wrote Croson) she also wrote opinions like Casey and Grutter, which essentially preserved liberal decisions like Roe and Bakke, respectively.
It would be very interesting to know whether, in retrospect, Reagan thought O'Connor was a good choice and what, if Reagan were alive today, he would say about her legacy. Posted
10:34 AM
by JB [link]