| Balkinization   |
|
Balkinization
|
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
[REDACTED]
David Luban
On April 15, Guantanamo detainee Majid Khan was reviewed by a Combatant Status Review Tribunal; the transcript was released yesterday by the censors. The government alleges that he is a high-value captive, who had been prepped by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed for devastating attacks on the U.S. He denies it. Last fall, Majid Khan was at the center of an amazing piece of litigation: his lawyers filed a motion demanding that they be allowed to see him, and the government opposed it, claiming that the meeting might lead to the disclosure of classified methods of acquiring information. In other words, Majid Khan might tell his lawyers what his captors did to him. Marty posted about this Kafkaesque reply here. According to the New York Times, Khan’s family says that Khan told them that "Americans had used torture tactics on Majid that included binding his hands and feet in a chair and tightening the bonds every hour." The Times story continues: What the mental torture Majid Khan alleges is, of course, [REDACTED]. But he mentions isolation, and states that out of desperation he cut or chewed through an artery in his arm twice. The Times: I’d like to point out that both the CIA and Pentagon replies were non-responsive. Paul Gimigliano did not say, "no, we never bound his hands and feet in a chair and tightened the bonds every hour." He said only that the U.S. doesn’t torture, and the agency follows the law. As usual, this ducks the question of whether under the U.S. and agency interpretations, this tactic is not considered torture or illegal. Likewise, Cmdr. Gordon’s response to Khan’s description of what drove him nearly to suicide is simply to say that he was treated "humanely." But "humanely" is, once again, not a denial. "Humane" is pretty minimal, by the government’s definitions. Remember Alberto Gonzales’s answer to Ted Kennedy’s questions at his confirmation hearings: "I would define humane treatment as a basic level of decent treatment that includes such things as food, shelter, clothing, and medical care." (Written response of Alberto R. Gonzales to questions posed by Senator Edward M. Kennedy, question #15, January 2005.) You can give someone food, shelter, clothing, and medical care while isolating him, playing on his weaknesses, and doing anything in your power to drive him mad. Are Majid Khan’s allegations true or false? Did you bind him in a chair and tighten the bonds or didn’t you? Did you isolate him and play on his weaknesses to drive him crazy, or didn’t you? What did you do to him?
Comments:
Some chucklehead at RedState was cackling over how trivial the "mental torture" examples in the transcript were. I pointed out that after everything shocking is redacted, only the silly is left -- wasted words of course.
While Khan's complaints about flat basketballs, substandard deodorant and shaving do not preclude the fact that he probably underwent classified coercive interrogation techniques, it doesn't make his father's claims of "torture" which go beyond these techniques especially credible.
Basketball at Gitmo is reserved as a reward for cooperative detainees which are also allowed to fraternize with other detainees. Thus, the story about isolation at Gitmo also does not ring true. Here is the unclassified summary of evidence against Majid Khan presented at the Combatant Status Review Tribunal if anyone here is even mildly interested. The evidence includes the testimony and physical evidence obtained from two men convicted in the US of providing material support to al Qaeda. At minimum, the evidence indicates that Khan also provided material assistance to al Qaeda. At most, he was training to become a terrorist himself in Pakistan in coordination with Khalid Sheik Muhammad. It is interesting to note that Khalid Sheik Muhammad was captured in Pakistan sometime before March 1, 2003 and Khan was captured shortly thereafter on March 5. The CIA supposedly intensively interrogated KSM before his capture was publicized and used this intelligence to roll up other al Qaeda cells around Pakistan. It is more than possible that Khan was one of these captures. Any intel gained from KSM would have been classified and not included in Khan's unclassified evidence summary.
Instead, it's discouraging open and honest dialogue. cambridge satchel | cambridge satchel us | cambridge satchel | cambridge satchel company | Cheap Soccer Jersey | hermes birkin
hello, veryone!cambridgesatchel4u offers more details on Moist cloth Hand bags like: wholesale handbags, tote handbags, briefcases, backpack, and many others. Stop by this great web site by to consult a quantity of handcrafted leather-based merchandise. Still cambridge satchel is designed for one during this couple of years.What's so great about the Italian builders when using the Eu finish and even normal plant chemical dyes be greater than the application of a solid clean end and additionally chemical dyes.hence the cambridge satchel will be the best option.
Pet them, snuggle with these, not to mention dog leashes prepare these guys.
Post a Comment
For every they make certain that you are unable to permit them to have almost any give diet that you simply can not consume. Incorporate insert them in numerous room in your home although you are drinking all your recipe. You also need so that you give these items dog boots poorer part in daytime. Of having the unhealthy weight . puppy could be equipped to lose weight is that if there're exercising not to mention having to eat the appropriate way of measuring pet dog collars and leashes foodstuffs. Immediately you're letting them hold the correct amount liquid. It willaids to make sure they're hydrated all through play dog leashes time.
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers Andrew Koppelman, The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Health Care Reform (Oxford University Press, 2013)
James E. Fleming and Linda C. McClain, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013) Balkinization Symposium on Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues
Andrew Koppelman, Defending American Religious Neutrality (Harvard University Press, 2013)
Brian Z. Tamanaha, Failing Law Schools (University of Chicago Press, 2012)
Sanford Levinson, Framed: America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance (Oxford University Press, 2012)
Linda C. McClain and Joanna L. Grossman, Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women's Equal Citizenship (Cambridge University Press, 2012)
Mary Dudziak, War Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences (Oxford University Press, 2012)
Jack M. Balkin, Living Originalism (Harvard University Press, 2011)
Jason Mazzone, Copyfraud and Other Abuses of Intellectual Property Law (Stanford University Press, 2011)
Richard W. Garnett and Andrew Koppelman, First Amendment Stories, (Foundation Press 2011)
Jack M. Balkin, Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World (Harvard University Press, 2011)
Gerard Magliocca, The Tragedy of William Jennings Bryan: Constitutional Law and the Politics of Backlash (Yale University Press, 2011)
Bernard Harcourt, The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order (Harvard University Press, 2010)
Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (Harvard University Press, 2010) Balkinization Symposium on The Decline and Fall of the American Republic
Ian Ayres. Carrots and Sticks: Unlock the Power of Incentives to Get Things Done (Bantam Books, 2010)
Mark Tushnet, Why the Constitution Matters (Yale University Press 2010)
Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff: Lifecycle Investing: A New, Safe, and Audacious Way to Improve the Performance of Your Retirement Portfolio (Basic Books, 2010)
Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009)
Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009)
Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009)
Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009)
Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009)
Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008)
David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007)
Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007)
Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007)
Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006)
Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006)
Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006)
Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005)
Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |