| Balkinization   |
|
Balkinization
|
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
What Would the Iraq Redeployment Bills Actually Do, Anyway?
Marty Lederman
One salutary effect of the blogosphere is that it has prompted the mainstream media to more frequently link to primary documents -- e.g., leaked memos, government reports, etc. -- that are the subject of their breaking stories. It was not too long ago that the public lacked ready access to the very subject matter of many important news stories -- not without difficult and time-consuming library retrieval, anyway.
Comments:
In other words, we're supposed to rejoice because they barely passed a meaningless symbolic gesture that Bush will veto anyway.
A dirty little secret of the news business is that reporters -- especially political reporters and legislative generalists, as opposed to subject-matter beat specialists -- seldom even read legislation. They tend to rely on handouts, Hill staff, word-of-mouth paraphrases and secondary sources to say what a bill's provisions actually mean. These sources are often wrong, and sometimes deliberately spinning. The reporters -- even those from top-tier news organizations -- are usually not biased, just lazy and ignorant.
Thanks for the legwork.
I'll bet lots of reporters learned the wrong lesson from the CBS fake memos issue from the 2004 campaign. They have realized CBS would have gotten away with the forgery had they simply quoted the memos and NOT published them online. Publishing them allowed them to be debunked.
My point being that reporters will both be lazy (not linking to stuff they haven't read, even though it is relevant) and venal (not linking to relevant stuff they HAVE read, because it hurts their case).
jao: We've recently learned, via the "secret" ability of the AG to appoint US Attorneys without Senate confirmation, that even legislators don't read bills they are voting on. Why should reporters?
A. Harry,
I suggest that yours is an excellent example of how lamentable is reporters' failure to read and understand the official documents. As I understand it, the provision you mention was slipped into the conference report, which typically would have been published in the Congressional Record. A detail-oriented reporter could have blown the whistle at the time. Perhaps the most egregious example of misreporting in my recent memory was Sen. Specter's FISA "compromise" last year, which clearly was a very different bill than his rhetorical spin -- and the big time media -- described. Only in blogs such as this one and Volokh was it possible to find accurate analysis of the bill's provisions.
The comment about near realtime availability, and longterm archival by news media, of draft language for legislation, is a complex topic. The Balkinization blog is the only site I know which consistently provides that utility. Reasons why other websites seem less conscientious, more narrow, and have many drawbacks even more detrimental to public dialog are numerous, though if I succeed in writing a responsive essay to examine the disarray of those other sources and reasons why status quo is morphing into a more participatory paradign, I will make an effort to draft a preview for Balkinzation, provided its reference documentation and footnoting seem sufficiently ample to warrant submission. For now, though, I think we all appreciate the expansions in Balkinization, and even its publication of its own topics index with intrasite links, as the state of the art for understanding what congress and the president are doing in as close to realtime as possible given the state of the internet, and the condition of our own personal time limitations and schedules concomitantly.
Post a Comment
|
Books by Balkinization Bloggers
Jack M. Balkin, The Laws of Change: I Ching and the Philosophy of Life (2d Edition, Sybil Creek Press 2009)
Brian Z. Tamanaha, Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton University Press 2009)
Andrew Koppelman and Tobias Barrington Wolff, A Right to Discriminate?: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. James Dale Warped the Law of Free Association (Yale University Press 2009)
Jack M. Balkin and Reva B. Siegel, The Constitution in 2020 (Oxford University Press 2009)
Heather K. Gerken, The Democracy Index: Why Our Election System Is Failing and How to Fix It (Princeton University Press 2009)
Mary Dudziak, Exporting American Dreams: Thurgood Marshall's African Journey (Oxford University Press 2008) Neil Netanel, Copyright's Paradox (Oxford Univ. Press 2008)
David Luban, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge Univ. Press 2007) Ian Ayres, Super Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007)
Jack M. Balkin, James Grimmelmann, Eddan Katz, Nimrod Kozlovski, Shlomit Wagman and Tal Zarsky, eds., Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment (N.Y.U. Press 2007)
Jack M. Balkin and Beth Simone Noveck, The State of Play: Law, Games, and Virtual Worlds (N.Y.U. Press 2006)
Andrew Koppelman, Same Sex, Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines (Yale University Press 2006)
Brian Tamanaha, Law as a Means to an End (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (Oxford University Press 2006)
Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (Cambridge University Press 2006)
Jack M. Balkin, ed., What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said (N.Y.U. Press 2005)
Sanford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford University Press 2004) Balkin.com homepage Bibliography Conlaw.net Cultural Software Writings Opeds The Information Society Project BrownvBoard.com Useful Links Syllabi and Exams |