E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
President Bush: A Man of Conviction and Principles, But...
Brian Tamanaha
Rich Lowry of the National Review reports on his fascinating interview with President Bush. Here are excerpts:
Basically right after “hello,” the next words out of [the President's] mouth are: “Let me just first tell you that I’ve never been more convinced that the decisions I made are the right decisions. I firmly believe — I’m oftentimes asked about, well, you’re stubborn and all this. If you believe in a strategy, in Washington, D.C. you’ve got to stick to that strategy, see. People want you to change. It’s tactics that shift, but the strategic vision has not, and will not, shift.”
Never been more convinced. It’s that kind of certainty that drives Bush’s critics batty. For Bush, it is essential to meaningful governance: “If you don’t have a set of principles to fall back on, you flounder, and it matters. It creates waves, and the waves rock the decision-making process. I’ve just got a set of principles I believe in. And I tell people out there when I speak to them, I say, one thing about my presidency is when I get home — and home is Texas — I’m going to look in the mirror and say, ‘The same set of principles that were etched in my heart when I told the people in 2000 what I believe are still there.’ That may be — tactics are different, you adjust, you make different decisions. But the principles are inviolate.” …. Bush’s faith in the rightness of his strategy in the broader war is deep-seated — it is, indeed, a product of faith. “Freedom is universal,” Bush says. “And I recognize there’s a debate around the world about the kind of — whether that principle is real. I call it moral relativism, if people do not believe that certain people can be free. I mean, I just cannot subscribe to that. People — I know it upsets people when I ascribe that to my belief in an Almighty, and that I believe a gift from that Almighty is universal freedom. That’s what I believe.”
....
These are extraordinary statements by President Bush, the most striking of which is: "Let me just first tell you that I’ve never been more convinced that the decisions I made are the right decisions." A jarring assertion of confidence this is, given the ongoing political, social, economic, and humanitarian disaster in Iraq.
There are ample reasons to believe that President Bush is indeed a man of conviction and principles, but having these admirable qualities are not enough in a person or a President. Another character trait of equal importance is the capacity to recognize and acknowledge that one--that everyone--makes mistakes. Without this, conviction and principles become blind dogmatism.
What the principles are, and how they work out in practice, also matters, at least as much as being principled. President Bush is committed to human freedom, he says, yet at the same time his Administration has engaged in many acts that flout the rule of law (as documented repeatly in this blog--see sidebar--and elsewhere). The rule of law has arguably made a greater contribution to human freedom than any other human invention. Acts that diminish or threaten to deteriorate the rule of law, therefore, strike blows against human freedom.
President Bush is committed to universal freedom owing to his faith in an Almightly who has conferred this freedom on all human beings. An inseverable aspect of human freedom is respect for human dignity and the inviolability of the human spirit. Yet Bush is condoning the use of techniques--under the euphemism "alternative set of procedures"--against prisoners that fail to respect their dignity as humans and that aim to destroy their human spirit. A President who proudly avows his commitment to principle and belief in the Almighty has directed our country to engage a terrible flirtation with torture (call it whatever you want).
Addendum: With respect to President Bush's commitment to principle in connection with torture, watch this video (thanks to Michael Perry on Mirror of Justice) and judge for yourself. And here is a thoughtful, principled position on torture from a Christian viewpoint. Posted
1:33 PM
by Brian Tamanaha [link]
Comments:
Someone needs to tell him that "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." People got what they paid for when they elected him twice. First time, shame on you. Second time, shame on me.
It was good for Matt Lauer to push him on 9/11 about the detainee treatment. He simply did not want to respond. That is the weakness - not the strength of his beliefs - but the denial of consequences of his policies/tactics.
Also, he needs to say to America that his bottomline is that we are on a 25 year mission in Iraq - that's a minimum based on the experience in Germany, Japan and Korea AFTER the war (we are still in the war). Americans have to decide if that is the commitment we want to make. For his goal, that is what I would think is needed at minimum - basically a commitment of talent and treasure for a little more than a generation. Best, Ben
Someone needs to tell him that "The road to hell is paved with good intentions." People got what they paid for when they elected him twice. First time, shame on you. Second time, shame on me.
It was good for Matt Lauer to push him on 9/11 about the detainee treatment. He simply did not want to respond. That is the weakness - not the strength of his beliefs - but the denial of consequences of his policies/tactics.
Also, he needs to say to America that his bottomline is that we are on a 25 year mission in Iraq - that's a minimum based on the experience in Germany, Japan and Korea AFTER the war (we are still in the war). Americans have to decide if that is the commitment we want to make. For his goal, that is what I would think is needed at minimum - basically a commitment of talent and treasure for a little more than a generation. Best, Ben
I am often stuck by Bush's repeated insistence that he "was elected to protect the 'American people' and that's just what I'm going to do" when in point of fact he was elected to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America", a task to which, given his extraordinary claims of unchecked executive power, he appears entirely resistant.
"Let me just first tell you that I’ve never been more convinced that the decisions I made are the right decisions." A jarring assertion of confidence this is, given the ongoing political, social, economic, and humanitarian disaster in Iraq.
Bush isn't confident, he's terrified and insecure. His confidence is a facade, and he'll do anything to keep that facade in place. That's the problem.
The guy is nutty as a fruit cake, and let's note especially that superstitions, self-serving assumptions, hypocrisy, fallacies, frauds, delusions, and pure gibberish are nothing that could accurately be described as PRINCIPLES.
Many on the Left have made the mistake that Bush does what he does for selfish reasons (e.g. Bush took us into Iraq for the oil). In fact, he does what he does because he is a unblinking adherent to his principles. In this way, he has much in common with the communists of yesteryear who would either deny or rationalize the brutality of Stalin, because nothing matters more than the Theory.
cool wah also browse your site , I really like and are excited about this can find your site .. Greetings Introduction Of My Seo Milanisti obat perangsang | obat kuat | alat bantu sex