E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Students at the University of Maryland Law School are selling tickets to their annual dance at $45 a person and $80 a couple. As a person whom I suspect was voted "Most Likely to be Dateless" from ages 15-25, I've often wondered about the couple discount at school dances, whether or not gay couples are included. At middle school and even high school dances, the incentive system seems perverse, given that I do not think school authorities should encourage pairing up at that age (it will happen regardless). But even in law school, I wonder whether this is a minor form of discriminationthat, while hardly worth a federal case, is worth a paragraph or so in Balkinization (and probably no more). After all, if we worry about stigmatic messages, I think 20sometimes without dates get lots of them and might benefit from one less. Curious what others think. Posted
5:45 PM
by Mark Graber [link]
Comments:
It's a warm-up for acceptance of married filing jointly, which raises singles' rates.
And what about Ladies Night, unescorted ladies get in free, get half-price drinks, etc.?
putting aside the question of whether or not those who are unable to get dates for the prom are members of a protected class for constitutional purposes, mark, you and i well know that our beloved father would have gone miles out of his way to find a date simply so he would not have had to pay the extra five bucks on himself to go to the dance.... assuming he would have wanted to have gone to the prom at all...
"After all, if we worry about stigmatic messages, I think 20sometimes without dates get lots of them and might benefit from one less. "
my experience is that such pressures actually increase once one hits the thirtysomethings. it is the phenomenon of the 'token single' and has been a strong enough stigma to deter friends of mine from attending otherwise important social events.
henry is right that one can get around the cost issue by 'splitting' a couple's ticket with another token single, but it does not change the implicit message received.
finally, regarding the same sex issue, at my school, the couple ticket could only be purchased by a mixed-sex pairing. it was wrong and sent the additional message that being gay was 'bad,' but i would be highly surprised to find that that policy has changed.