E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
I've had a couple of posts about computer crime law as a law school course, and I wanted to turn to a more practical question: Can you practice computer crime law?
The answer is yes, particularly on the prosecution side. At the federal level, the Justice Department in Washington, D.C. has a large Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section (where I worked from 1998-2001). Most of the major U.S. Attorney's Offices have started Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property units, and every U.S. Attorney's Office has at least one computer crime specialist. At the state and local level, most of the major state offices have some kind of High Technology Crime Unit. All of this means that a prosecutor with an understanding of computer crime law will find a lot of opportunities. As I noted in my last post, computer crime law covers lots of new questions of legal doctrine; a solid knowledge of the new areas of law can help a lawyer carve out a very useful and interesting niche.
The development of computer crime law has been hindered by the scarcity of defense attorneys who understand it. Most defense attorneys are pretty clueless about this stuff. They don't understand the relevant technology, and they don't understand the nuances of the law. This means that they often don't raise good legal arguments that they should be raising, and that there are fewer judicial opinions on the key questions than there should be. A few attorneys have specialized in defending computer crime cases, most notably Jennifer Granick, but most computer crime cases are defended by lawyers who don't have any particular knowledge or expertise in the field. This creates a significant opportunity for young lawyers in particular. If you understand the law and the technology, you'll have a very helpful knowledge base that can help clients even if you lack other practice experience in criminal law. Posted
7:04 PM
by Anonymous [link]