Balkinization  

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Captain Fishback's Letter to Senator McCain

Marty Lederman

The Washington Post today publishes the complete text of a September 16th letter (below) from Captain Ian Fishback (see Scott's post) to Senator John McCain. Juxtaposing this letter and Tim Flanigan's responses to the Senate on torture and inhumane treatment (discussed here), an accompanying Post editorial opines that "it is an odious thing that the top two law enforcement officers of the United States [Gonzales and Flanigan] will both be people who resort to evasive legalisms in response to simple questions about uncivilized conduct."


Dear Senator McCain:

I am a graduate of West Point currently serving as a Captain in the U.S. Army Infantry. I have served two combat tours with the 82nd Airborne Division, one each in Afghanistan and Iraq. While I served in the Global War on Terror, the actions and statements of my leadership led me to believe that United States policy did not require application of the Geneva Conventions in Afghanistan or Iraq. On 7 May 2004, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's testimony that the United States followed the Geneva Conventions in Iraq and the "spirit" of the Geneva Conventions in Afghanistan prompted me to begin an approach for clarification. For 17 months, I tried to determine what specific standards governed the treatment of detainees by consulting my chain of command through battalion commander, multiple JAG lawyers, multiple Democrat and Republican Congressmen and their aides, the Ft. Bragg Inspector General's office, multiple government reports, the Secretary of the Army and multiple general officers, a professional interrogator at Guantanamo Bay, the deputy head of the department at West Point responsible for teaching Just War Theory and Law of Land Warfare, and numerous peers who I regard as honorable and intelligent men.

Instead of resolving my concerns, the approach for clarification process leaves me deeply troubled. Despite my efforts, I have been unable to get clear, consistent answers from my leadership about what constitutes lawful and humane treatment of detainees. I am certain that this confusion contributed to a wide range of abuses including death threats, beatings, broken bones, murder, exposure to elements, extreme forced physical exertion, hostage-taking, stripping, sleep deprivation and degrading treatment. I and troops under my command witnessed some of these abuses in both Afghanistan and Iraq.

This is a tragedy. I can remember, as a cadet at West Point, resolving to ensure that my men would never commit a dishonorable act; that I would protect them from that type of burden. It absolutely breaks my heart that I have failed some of them in this regard.

That is in the past and there is nothing we can do about it now. But, we can learn from our mistakes and ensure that this does not happen again. Take a major step in that direction; eliminate the confusion. My approach for clarification provides clear evidence that confusion over standards was a major contributor to the prisoner abuse. We owe our soldiers better than this. Give them a clear standard that is in accordance with the bedrock principles of our nation.

Some do not see the need for this work. Some argue that since our actions are not as horrifying as Al Qaeda's, we should not be concerned. When did Al Qaeda become any type of standard by which we measure the morality of the United States? We are America, and our actions should be held to a higher standard, the ideals expressed in documents such as the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

Others argue that clear standards will limit the President's ability to wage the War on Terror. Since clear standards only limit interrogation techniques, it is reasonable for me to assume that supporters of this argument desire to use coercion to acquire information from detainees. This is morally inconsistent with the Constitution and justice in war. It is unacceptable.

Both of these arguments stem from the larger question, the most important question that this generation will answer. Do we sacrifice our ideals in order to preserve security? Terrorism inspires fear and suppresses ideals like freedom and individual rights. Overcoming the fear posed by terrorist threats is a tremendous test of our courage. Will we confront danger and adversity in order to preserve our ideals, or will our courage and commitment to individual rights wither at the prospect of sacrifice? My response is simple. If we abandon our ideals in the face of adversity and aggression, then those ideals were never really in our possession. I would rather die fighting than give up even the smallest part of the idea that is "America."

Once again, I strongly urge you to do justice to your men and women in uniform. Give them clear standards of conduct that reflect the ideals they risk their lives for.

With the Utmost Respect,

-- Capt. Ian Fishback

1st Battalion,
504th Parachute Infantry Regiment,
82nd Airborne Division,
Fort Bragg, North Carolina

Comments:

This came to mind:
"Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

With that in mind and the notion that terrorists hate freedom, now that the police chief of the US capitol has adopted a policy to shoot uncooperative people in the head if they look too nervous or dress too warm for the weather, it would seem the the US is losing the 'war on terror'. I once knew someone who wore a snowmobile suit during summer months, when we was going to college. That person was not a terrorist, and never deserved to die. How quickly we have given up our ideals.

Perhaps democracy is a failed experiment that must wait for humanity to become either more peaceful or more courageous.
 

CPT Fishback is a noble officer and his comments reflect his training and attention to the ideals to which this country was founded. Unfortunately, CPT Fishback will directly and indirectly feel the rath of the "political process" within the military. No doubt Rumsfelt has already given the order to push this soldier from our ranks. I must stay that with all the other scandals that have yet to materialize a "smoking gun" within the DOD, CPT Fishback will be a sacrifical lamb to the ongoing mistruth of why we are in Iraq.

As to why soldiers do what they do..war makes people change in strange ways-it has happened with other wars and will continue to do so..
 

Wow - you're blog is full of good info. It's getting hard to find blogs with useful content and people talking about snowmobile these days. I have just started my Latest snowmobile news blog and would really appreciate you coming by - thanks again
 

We had been blogging trying to find how our world sees lawyer. It has been a lifeline for us. Your site provides some of the best examples of this sort and we will bookmark yours. Another one we found was and appears to be related to yours is lawyer site/blog. It pretty much covers lawyer related stuff.
 

I skim a lot of blogs, and so far yours is in the Top 3 of my list of favorites. I'm going to dive in and try my hand at it, so wish me luck.

It'll be in a totally different area than yours (mine is about danger of smoking) I know, it sounds strange, but it's like anything, once you learn more about it, it's pretty cool. It's mostly about danger of smoking related articles and subjects.
 

FREE Wordpress Hosted Blogs With 10 Customised Templates To Choose From at Blogsilla.com

people magazine online

Free unlimited number of blogs
 

Hi, Thanks for your interesting blog. Keep up the great work! I also have a site & blog about work from home doing data entry
, please feel free to visit.
 

go go gadget spambot!

I think the ship has long since sailed from our moral high ground.
 

If you are looking wow power leveling, buy warcraft gold as well as WOW Power Leveling and World Of wow levelingWhen you need someone to listen,FFXI Gil, I'll be there. When you need a hug, cheap FFXI Gil,I'll be there. When you need someone to hold your hand, I'll be there. When you need someone to wipe your tears, guess what? I'll be there. William Shakespeare
 

Post a Comment

Older Posts
Newer Posts
Home