E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
Here's further evidence that if Bush and his advisers are strategic, they will apply a reverse litmus test in Supreme Court appointments. A recent (June 24th-26th, 2005) CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll shows that 65 percent of Americans do not want the President to appoint a Justice who will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, compared to 29 percent who want him to do so. (A similar Pew Research Center survey conducted from June 8th to June 12th shows that 30 percent would like Roe "completely overturned" while 62 percent would oppose it.).
The CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll also shows that 55 percent of those polled want abortion to be legal sometimes, 24 percent always legal, and only 22 percent always illegal. This confirms what pollsters have long understood-- that the median position in American public opinion is to allow some abortion restrictions but not complete criminalization. A nominee who promises not to overturn Roe v. Wade but who relentlessly chips away at it will provoke far less public opposition than a die hard opponent of Roe.
Of course, what the polsters probably didn't make clear to the people being polled was that Roe v Wade is shorthand for a constellation of court rulings which together assure that abortion can't be significantly restricted.
brett's point about what the pollsters may or may not have told those being polled is well taken; however, i would submit that without explaining the ruling, if you asked those being polled and the public in general what roe v. wade stands for, the general response would be that it stands for the proposition that there is a constitutional right for a woman obtain an abortion, regardless of whether or not one agrees or disagrees with the decision. the tenor of the original post is therefore valid.
My point is simply that most people may be unaware that the only way to get the sort of regulation increasing through pregnancy trimester scheme that Roe promised,(But never was intended to permit.) and which the public overwhelmingly supports, IS to appoint justices willing to overturn that constellation of rulings.
I'm not impressed with polls measuring public attitudes about subjects where the public is grossly ignorant, or even possessed of negative knowlege.