E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
On Monday, President Bush promised voters in Iowa, "We will not have a draft so long as I am president of the United States."
What did he mean? Certainly, it was more than "Under current circumstances, I do not intend to have adraft." The promise sounds more like, "No matter what, we will not have a draft."
Is this really sound public policy? Aren't there some circumstances where it would be appropriate to have a draft? We needed a draft back in WWI and there was broad public support for that war. Can we really be so sure that we will not need one for what young people consider to be an unpopular war.
Or to put it another way.... Bush criticized Kerry for giving other countries a veto on when the U.S. goes to war. But Bush turns around and gives 18 and 19 year olds a veto on our ability to wage war.
Kerry certainly isn't going to call him on this. He isn't going to say, "Well, actually I can imagine instances where a draft would be appropriate."
But Bush is leading a race to the bottom here. At the next debate it might be appropriate to ask the President, "Since you're so sure that we will not have a draft, do you support repealing the requirement that 18 year olds register for the selective service system?"
Posted
4:17 PM
by Ian Ayres [link]
Comments:
How come nobody ever mentions the single most obvious alternative to the draft, namely paying a market-clearing salary? I guarantee that if the Army were to raise the base salary of an E-1 buck private to, say, $150,000 per year (plus benefits, etc.), then recruits would be lined up around the block several times over.
Great! Normally We in no way understand overall content though the way people had written this information is just awesome and this retained this desire for reading through and that i liked this.