Balkinization  

Tuesday, April 13, 2004

JB

John Ashcroft, Bane or Boon to Terrorists?

Compare and discuss:

1. Ashcroft ignores terrorism before 9/11:

Draft reports by the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks portray Attorney General John Ashcroft as largely uninterested in counterterrorism issues before Sept. 11 despite intelligence warnings that summer that Al Qaeda was planning a large, perhaps catastrophic, terrorist attack, panel officials and others with access to the reports have said.

They said the draft reports, which are expected to be completed and made public during two days of hearings by the commission this week, show that F.B.I. officials were alarmed throughout 2001 by what they perceived as Mr. Ashcroft's lack of interest in terrorism issues and his decision in August 2001 to reject the bureau's request for a large expansion of its counterterrorism programs.

The draft reports, they said, quote the F.B.I.'s former counterterrorism chief, Dale Watson, as saying he "fell off my chair" when he learned that Mr. Ashcroft had failed to list combating terrorism as one of the department's priorities in a March 2001 department-wide memo.


2. Ashcroft uses 9/11 to attack his critics and accuses those who disagree with his policies of helping terrorists:
Attorney General John Ashcroft lashed out Thursday at critics of the administration's response to terrorism, saying questions about whether its actions undermine the Constitution only serve to help terrorists.

"To those who pit Americans against immigrants, citizens against non-citizens, to those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve," Ashcroft told the Senate Judiciary Committee. "They give ammunition to America's enemies and pause to America's friends. They encourage people of good will to remain silent in the face of evil.


Come on, John, seriously, who really helped the terrorists the most? The ACLU, or you?


Comments:

Appointments to Article III judgeships should require 60 votes for confirmation, in order to promote Presidential- Senate bargaining and more moderate candidates.

cambridge bag
cambridge satchels
cambridge satchel bag
 

The silliest thing a person can do is think that the one that hurt them most, won’t hurt them again.
Agen Judi Online Terpercaya
 

Post a Comment

Older Posts
Newer Posts
Home