E-mail:
Jack Balkin: jackbalkin at yahoo.com
Bruce Ackerman bruce.ackerman at yale.edu
Ian Ayres ian.ayres at yale.edu
Corey Brettschneider corey_brettschneider at brown.edu
Mary Dudziak mary.l.dudziak at emory.edu
Joey Fishkin joey.fishkin at gmail.com
Heather Gerken heather.gerken at yale.edu
Abbe Gluck abbe.gluck at yale.edu
Mark Graber mgraber at law.umaryland.edu
Stephen Griffin sgriffin at tulane.edu
Jonathan Hafetz jonathan.hafetz at shu.edu
Jeremy Kessler jkessler at law.columbia.edu
Andrew Koppelman akoppelman at law.northwestern.edu
Marty Lederman msl46 at law.georgetown.edu
Sanford Levinson slevinson at law.utexas.edu
David Luban david.luban at gmail.com
Gerard Magliocca gmaglioc at iupui.edu
Jason Mazzone mazzonej at illinois.edu
Linda McClain lmcclain at bu.edu
John Mikhail mikhail at law.georgetown.edu
Frank Pasquale pasquale.frank at gmail.com
Nate Persily npersily at gmail.com
Michael Stokes Paulsen michaelstokespaulsen at gmail.com
Deborah Pearlstein dpearlst at yu.edu
Rick Pildes rick.pildes at nyu.edu
David Pozen dpozen at law.columbia.edu
Richard Primus raprimus at umich.edu
K. Sabeel Rahmansabeel.rahman at brooklaw.edu
Alice Ristroph alice.ristroph at shu.edu
Neil Siegel siegel at law.duke.edu
David Super david.super at law.georgetown.edu
Brian Tamanaha btamanaha at wulaw.wustl.edu
Nelson Tebbe nelson.tebbe at brooklaw.edu
Mark Tushnet mtushnet at law.harvard.edu
Adam Winkler winkler at ucla.edu
On June 30,
Vermont Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy fell,
broke his hip, and had immediate surgery.He is expected to make a full recovery but will miss time in the Senate.This weekend, Senate Majority Leader Chuck
Schumer announced
that he has COVID-19 and will self-isolate for a week.Earlier this year, New Mexico Democratic
Senator Ben Ray Lujan missed
time (after a stroke) as did
North Dakota Republican Senator Kevin Cramer (after a gardening accident).With the Senate so closely divided, some have
wondered what the absence of a senator can mean for its agenda.
The short answer
is “not that much” – provided the absence is relatively short.
First, a great
deal of the Senate’s work is not conducted through contested votes.Because most substantial measures require
sixty votes, the emphasis is negotiating a bipartisan agreement.Without that, nothing will move even if the
majority party is at full strength.With
a deal, votes are typically fairly plentiful so one or a few absent senators
will not matter.
Second, the Senate
– very much unlike the House – has a long tradition of collegiality.It is a small place, full of repeat players
with copious special needs.Few senators
want to take a scorched earth approach to senators of the opposite party for
fear that those tactics will be reciprocated.Thus, on any but the highest-profile votes, senators have commonly agreed
to “pair” with an absent senator taking the opposite position.The senator who is present refrains from
voting and announces that she or he would have voted one way and is a pair with
the absent senator, who would have voted the other way.As grassroots advocates in both parties have
become quicker to criticize senators for any departure from party orthodoxy,
pairs have been difficult to achieve on high-profile votes but at still
possible on more routine matters.
The two parties’
floor managers (typically but not always the majority and minority leaders)
usually try to avoid forcing important votes at moments when a senator of the
other party is unavailable if a small delay would solve the problem – and the
floor leader of the absent senator’s own party has means of detailing any
ill-considered attempt to do so.
Finally, a fair
amount of the Senate’s schedule is devoted to running out this or that
clock.For example, although nominations
are no longer subject to filibuster, the minority party may still force a
certain amount of debate on each one, consuming precious floor time and
effectively constraining how many nominations the majority can move.Procedures for moving a reconciliation bill,
too, guarantee
opponents a debate of twenty hours.Even
without permanent rules allowing debate, the “time agreements" under
which routine bills come to the Senate floor commonly allow significant amounts of time for debate.
Because senators,
even of the majority party, commonly resist sessions that start early, end
late, or occur on days other than Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays, finding
enough session time to satisfy the debate mandates attached to various nominations
and legislation can be challenging for the majority leader.During periods when Sen. Schumer lacks the
votes to move anything controversial because of his own absence or those of one
or more members of his party, he may nonetheless have his deputies convene the
Senate and run down the clock on various pieces of pending business.
To accommodate
senators’ preferences for long weekends back in their home states, the Senate
commonly “stacks” many votes in a row, often on wholly unconnected matters, just
before the Senate goes out or just after it returns to session.As long as Senator Schumer has all of his
senators together for stacked votes every now and then, the Senate should be
able to stumble along almost as it usually does.The limiting factors remain senators’ willingness
to be in session and Republicans or holdout Democrats’ willingness to cut
deals.